According to SCOTUSblog, the Court has granted cert. in a habeas case today. Here's the description:
The third granted case, Renico v. Lett (09-338), tests whether it violates double jeopardy to stage a new trial after a state judge declared a mistrial after the jury foreman said the jurors were not going to be able to reach a verdict. The Sixth Circuit Court found jeopardy in that circumstance, rejecting the conflicting view of the Michigan Supreme Court.
The Sixth Circuit's unpublished decision can be found at Lett v. Renico, 316 Fed. Appx. 421 (6th Cir. Mar. 10, 2009). Notably, the unpublished decision includes a dissent. I have complained about this before, but it kind of suggests that it should not have been an unpublished decision, doesn't it?